Superintendent News & Views
November 5 School Election Update
By David Hill, North Tama Superintendent
City and school district elections will be
held across Iowa on Tuesday, November 5.
In the North Tama County Community School District, voters will select
four candidates to serve on the Board of Education and will vote on a special
ballot measure as well.
Four of the seven
Board of Education seats at North Tama will be decided in the November
election. Incumbents Doug Dvorak and
Valerie Bradley have filed papers to run for re-election in their director
districts. Tiffany Feisel and Mona
Larson have opted to not seek re-election.
Haley Blaine is
running unopposed for the Director District 3 seat being vacated by Mona
Larson. In Director District 7, three
candidates are running to replace Tiffany Feisel. Rebecca Dostal, Amber Monat, and David Boldt
have all filed nomination papers to be considered for the Director District 7
seat.
In the North Tama
district CANDIDATES must reside in the director district they are seeking to
represent, but ALL voters may vote for ALL board seats regardless of where in
the district the voter may live.
In a recent SUPERINTENDENT
NEWS & VIEWS column, I shared with you that the Iowa legislature has
extended the statewide one-cent sales tax for school infrastructure until 2051,
requiring the passage of a new Revenue Purpose Statement before a district may
access the funds that will be generated starting in 2031.
At their
September board meeting, the North Tama Board of Education decided to move
forward with this process by bringing to our patrons a ballot issue regarding
the allowed uses of the one-cent sales tax.
Several other area districts are holding similar ballot measures in this
election, and we’ll see ballot measures just like this one all over the state
of Iowa between now and the expiration of the current law.
Provided below in
a “Question & Answer” format is information regarding North Tama’s Revenue
Purpose Statement ballot issue and the process prescribed by state laws for our
district to continue to use these funds beyond 2031. If you have any other
questions after reviewing this information, please do not hesitate to contact
me by phone at (319) 478-2265 or by email at dhill@n-tama.k12.ia.us
WHAT IS A REVENUE PURPOSE
STATEMENT?
It is a ballot issue that
describes the allowed uses for the 1-cent sales tax in the State of Iowa that
is dedicated to all Iowa school districts. This one-cent sales tax is known as
SAVE (Secure an Advanced Vision for Education). North Tama’s current Revenue
Purpose Statement – originally passed in September 2008 – received overwhelming
support from district patrons. Now that the Iowa Legislature has extended
the sales tax to last until 2051, a new Revenue Purpose Statement is
needed.
WHAT IS BETTER FOR NORTH
TAMA SCHOOLS? A “YES” VOTE OR A “NO” VOTE?
While I wouldn’t presume to tell
you how to vote, I would offer that these RPS measures have been relatively
non-controversial all over the state. Many have called them a “no-brainer,” as
consumers statewide are already paying the one-cent sales tax and will continue
to pay it either way, and school districts statewide will receive the revenues
either way -- the RPS just gives districts a little more flexibility with the
dollars they are already receiving. A prevailing “YES” vote won’t cost you
anything, and it will allow North Tama to continue to maintain and upgrade
facilities, technology infrastructure, student technology, and transportation
equipment.
WILL THIS RAISE MY TAXES?
The outcome of this vote will
absolutely NOT raise your taxes - regardless of whether the YES
or NO vote prevails. The one-cent sales tax is already being collected
statewide and the legislature has now extended the one-cent sales tax until
2051. The sole purpose of the Revenue purpose Statement is to describe
and outline the uses for which the one-cent sales tax may be used at North Tama.
WHAT DO WE CURRENTLY DO
WITH THE ONE-CENT SALES TAX REVENUE?
Over the past 10 years North
Tama has used SAVE revenues for just about every type of infrastructure
expenditure allowed by law. Here are some examples:
- Major Addition & Remodeling Project including Locker Rooms, Gym Lobby, Jr. High Classrooms and Commons, Remodeling of Jr. High Classrooms, and Superintendent’s Office
- Athletic Facility Improvements (Dennis Field, Gymnasium, and NT Athletic Complex)
- Student Computers and 1-to-1 Devices as well as Teacher Computers
- Back-End Technology Infrastructure
- Fine Arts Improvements (including stage lighting, painting and carpeting band and vocal classrooms and the upcoming installation of a new acoustic shell and stage curtain)
- Air-Conditioning Classrooms
- HVAC Improvements (including boilers)
- Flooring Improvements (including gym and stage resurfacing, classroom flooring replacements, and installation of stair treads for increased safety)
- Playground Improvements
- Handicapped Accessibility Improvements (Elevator Repairs, Addition of ADA-Compliant Ramps)
- Sidewalk and Concrete Repairs
- Purchase of School Buses and Vehicles
- Retrofitting Route Buses with Seat Belts
- Air Conditioning School Buses
- Transportation Repairs (repairs over $2500 may be paid from SAVE)
- Improving Building Security (including secured access doors & security cameras)
- Installation of Energy-Efficient Lighting
- Roofs, Downspout, and Gutter Repair
- Added 4 Drinking Fountains with Water-Bottle Fillers
- Purchasing an Adjacent Lot and Demolishing a House for Additional Parking
IF THIS BALLOT MEASURE IS
APPROVED BY VOTERS, HOW WILL THE DISTRICT’S USE OF THE ONE-CENT SALES TAX
REVENUES CHANGE?
For the most part, I would expect
the district’s spending of the one-cent sales tax revenues to look very similar
to the types of uses listed in the previous question: to maintain and improve
district facilities, equipment, and infrastructure. Our current Revenue
Purpose Statement (which expires at the end of the current SAVE legislation)
was written with the same goal in mind as the newly proposed statement: to
allow maximum flexibility for the school district.
One possible change may be the
consideration of some larger projects that would require bonding against future
revenues. The approval of a new Revenue Purpose Statement now would allow
the district to bond against future revenues from the one-cent sales tax
through 2051 if necessary for more expensive projects.
WHY IS THIS NEEDED
NOW?
This isn’t absolutely needed
now, but it is needed sometime before the current SAVE law expires and the new,
extended SAVE law begins on January 1, 2031. You’ll see ballot measures just
like this one all over the state of Iowa between now and that date.
A new RPS is needed before a
district can structure revenue bonds against SAVE revenues that will be
generated on or after January 1, 2031. So, the approval of a new Revenue
Purpose Statement may be needed before any very large, expensive infrastructure
projects can take place in the district.
WHAT WILL NORTH TAMA DO IF
THE REVENUE PURPOSE STATEMENT IS NOT APPROVED?
As stated above, the district
needs to pass a Revenue Purpose Statement sometime before the current SAVE law
expires and the new, extended SAVE law begins on January 1, 2031. While a failure to pass the RPS wouldn’t
cause a major problem right now, it would be crippling for North Tama if the
RPS doesn’t pass sometime prior to 2031.
At the present time, it would only hold us back from MAJOR projects that
would require borrowing. Iowa law
requires a minimum of six months to elapse before another Revenue Purpose
Election can be held. If the Revenue Purpose Statement considered by voters in
November is not approved, either the same or a revised RPS can be brought back
to our voters. If the Board of Education wants to avoid the cost of holding a
special election, they may opt to wait two years until the next regular school
election.
WILL PASSAGE OF THE
REVENUE PURPOSE STATEMENT REQUIRE A “SUPER-MAJORITY”?
No. A simple majority (50%
+1) is needed for passage.
WHAT IF I HAVE ADDITIONAL
QUESTIONS?
If you have any other
questions after reviewing this information, please do not hesitate to contact
me by phone at (319) 478-2265 or by email at dhill@n-tama.k12.ia.us. The same questions
and answers that you read above are also posted on our website. As I receive
questions from district patrons, I may add to the “Q&A” document for
further clarification. You can find the
online “Q&A” at http://bit.ly/NTRPS.
I
encourage your feedback on this column, along with any questions you may have.
You are welcome to visit my blog at http://redhawksupt.blogspot.com/ where
you can read all of my columns and leave comments if you wish. You are also
welcome to follow me on Twitter, where my handle is @DavidRobertHill.
No comments:
Post a Comment